Final course evaluations SOC 726 Interpersonal Transactions Spring 2004
With the exception of the last question, scores range
from 1 = Instructor is below average to 5 = Instructor is superior. On the last
question, the range is 1 = YES, 0 = NO.
|
|
Mean |
|
Instructor
demonstrates enthusiasm for the subject |
4.75 |
|
Instructor
is effective in stimulating interest in the subject |
4.50 |
|
Instructor
communicates a genuine desire to help students learn |
5.00 |
|
Instructor
is willing to help students outside the classroom |
5.00 |
|
Instructor
is always present in class and arranges a substitute presentation |
4.50 |
|
Instructor
is prepared for each class meeting |
4.00 |
|
Instructor
explains the material clearly and understandably |
4.50 |
|
Instructor's
lectures are well organized |
4.00 |
|
Instructor
gives directions for assignments that are clearly understood |
4.50 |
|
Instructor
fully explains his or her grading standards and implements them accordingly |
4.50 |
|
Overall,
how would you grade this instructor as an effective teacher |
4.50 |
|
Would
you want to take another course from this instructor |
1.00 |
N = 4
Evaluation of Lecturing Performance
Lectures are very enthusiastic
It would be nice if lecture began on time so that it could end on time or shortly thereafter
Very good
Clarifies the reading and integrates them in a coherent picture
Evaluation of Reading Materials
Very good
The reading materials are usually very diverse in their perspectives which is appreciated
Very interesting. Offers a wide range of perspective on the (?) issue
Level of Teaching Sophistication
Excellent
High flexibility in seeing things from various points of view
Grad level class – met my expectations
Rapport with Students
I would say that rapport with students is positive. It is evident that Markus cares about the students
Excellent
Friendly and warm
Overall Evaluation of Instructor
Very good
Excellent
Good instructor – enjoyed class
Overall Evaluation of Class
Good class; learned a lot
The class was very enjoyable
More interesting than the group processes
Very good