Sociology 726

Interpersonal transactions

Spring 2004

 

 

Instructor:         Markus Kemmelmeier, Ph.D.

Office:              304 Mack Social Sciences

Phone:              784-1287

Email:               markusk@unr.edu

Times:              Tuesdays 2:15 - 5:00

Location:          Mack Social Sciences, Room 345

Office hours:     Monday 11-12, Thursday 1-2 or by appointment

 

Course description

This course provides a selective review of research and literature relating to interpersonal behavior.  It surveys a broad range of topics, including interpersonal cognition and perception, interpersonal expectancies, power, communication, but also various aspects relationships, attraction, aggression and helping behavior.  This diversity of topics is reflected in the readings which for the most part focus on original empirical and theoretical contributions rather than review articles.

Goals

This course has two main objectives.  The first objective is to provide an in-depth examination of important theories and findings pertaining to each research area.  The second objective is to develop an appreciation for some of the methodological approaches used in empirical investigations in these areas.  The third objective is to promote critical thinking in the evaluation of data or arguments that are advanced in order to support various theoretical positions.  To accomplish these goals, the typical reading assignment for each week consists of four to five papers spanning a variety of theoretical and empirical approaches.

Format

This course will follow a seminar format.  Whereas the instructor will take some time to provide some (historical) context of the readings for the day, the majority of the class will be open for discussion.  Your active participant is essential to the quality of the course.

Course materials

There will be a course pack available in the lobby of the sociology department, MSS 300.  Note that many of the articles can be downloaded via the website of the UNR library. 

Requirements

Reaction papers.  Every participant is required to write weekly reaction papers.  The reaction papers provide you with an opportunity to thoughtful elaborate on your ideas, questions, doubts, or concerns concerning the readings.  The preferred format of the reaction paper is a brief essay in which you try to expand on aspects that connect various readings, or in which you critically discuss apparent differences or contradictions between theoretical approaches or empirical findings.  You may also wish to apply various theoretical approaches to the same phenomenon and highlight their strengths and weaknesses.  You are free to write about anything you wish, as long as you integrate at least three of the readings.  The discussion of personal experiences or preferences is perfectly legitimate as long as they help you convey a conceptual point.

Keep in mind that I (MK) have read the papers as well; hence there is no need for extant summary of the papers.  Also, it is critical that you argue clearly, support your statements, and present justifications, e.g., for suggested extensions of the present research.

The reaction papers should be around one to two single-spaced pages, and should be turned in no later than 3 PM on Monday via email.  Please email your brief essay to all students in the course and to me.  Given that the reaction papers are a relatively open-ended task, the grading of the content of the reaction paper will be generous with grading focusing on thoughtfulness not “accuracy” of content.  However, please be sure to address at least three of the readings of the day in your reaction paper.

Research proposal.  Over the course of the semester, every participant is required to write a research proposal.  As long as you stay within the general purview of interpersonal relations you are free to pick any topic of interest to you.  The research proposal should focus on empirical research, but it is up to you whether you want to employ quantitative or qualitative methods of inquiry.

Writing the research proposal is a two-step process.  After spring break you are required to submit a 5-6 page outline of your proposal.  This outline should provide a general description of your proposal, motivating your project and elaborating its theoretical rational.  At the end of the term you must submit a full research proposal that includes a full-fledged theory part/introduction, elaboration of the research question(s) and/or hypotheses as well as an outline of the empirical methodology you are planning on using.  The assumption is that proposals are usually no shorter than 15 and no longer than 30 pages (double-spaced).  Use APA style (5th edition) or ASA style (4th edition).

The research proposals will be graded based on quality of review of relevant literature, quality of your own analysis and integration of that literature, originality/creativity and quality of writing.  (The first two criteria take priority over the second two criteria). 

 

Grading                      

In-class participation

20%

Weekly reaction papers

30%

Research proposal—outline

10%

Research proposal—full paper

40%

Total

100%

 

 


Schedule and readings

 

January 20

Organizational meeting  -- general issues

 

Jordan, C. H., & Zanna, M. P. (2001). How to read a journal article in social psychology. In L. L. Thompson (Ed.), The social psychology of organizational behavior (pp. 419-428). New York: Psychology Press. [reprinted in various other sources]

 

January 27

Interpersonal perception

 

Kelley, H. H. (1950). The warm-cold variable in first impressions of persons. Journal of Personality, 18, 431-439.+

Ross, L., & Nisbett, R. E. (1991). The person and the situation. McGraw-Hill. Chapter 2 “The power of the situation” & 5 “Lay personality and lay social psychology” (

Funder, D. C. (1999). Personality judgment: A realistic approach to person perception. San Diego: Academic. Chapter 3 “Error and accuracy in the study of personality judgment” pp. 57-79.

Ambady, N., & Rosenthal, R. (1993). Half a minute: Predicting teacher evaluations from thin slices of nonverbal behavior and physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 431-441. *

Andersen, S. M., Glassman, N. S., Chen, S., & Cole, S. W. (1995). Transference in social perception: The role of chronic accessibility in significant-other representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 41-57.*

 

February 3

Expectancies and hypothesis testing

 

Darley, J. M., & Fazio, R. H. (1980). Expectancy confirmation processes arising in the social interaction sequence. American Psychologist, 35, 867-881.

Word, C. O., Zanna, M. P., & Cooper, J. (1974). The nonverbal mediation of self-fulfilling prophecies in interracial interaction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 109-120.

Swann, W. B., Jr., & Ely, R. J. (1984). A battle of wills: Self-verification versus behavioral confirmation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1287-1302.

Jussim, L. (1993). Accuracy in interpersonal expectations: A reflection-construction analysis of current and classic research. Journal of Personality, 61, 637-668.

Snyder, M. & Swann, W. B. (1978). Hypothesis testing processes in social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 925-939.

 

February 10

Self-presentation and impression management

 

Leary, M. R., & Kowalski, R. M. (1990). Impression management: A literature review and two-component model. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 34-47. *

Scully, D., & Marolla, J. (1984). Convicted rapists’ vocabulary of motive: Excuses and justifications. Social Problems, 31, 530-544.+

Rudman, L. A. (1998). Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: The costs and benefits of counterstereotypical impression management. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 629-645.*
Rowatt, W. C., Cunningham, M. R., & Druen, P. B. (1999). Lying to get a date: The effect of facial physical attractiveness on the willingness to deceive prospective dating partners. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 16, 209-223.*
Cupach, W. R., & Metts, S. (1994). Face management in interpersonal communication. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. (pp. 1-16)

 

February 17

Stigma and stereotypes in interaction

 

Major, B., & Crocker, J. (1993). Social stigma: The consequences of attributional ambiguity. In D. M. Mackie, & D. L. Hamilton (Eds.), Affect, cognition, and stereotyping: Interactive processes in group perception (pp. 345-370). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Vorauer, J., & Kumhyr, S. M. (2001). Is this about you or me? Self- versus other-directed judgments and feelings in response to intergroup interaction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 706-719.+

Harber, K. D. (1998). Feedback to minorities: Evidence of a positive bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 622-628.*

Frable, D. E., Blackstone, T., & Scherbaum, C. (1990). Marginal and mindful: Deviants in social interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 140-149.*

Inzlicht, M., & Ben-Zeev, T. (2000). A threatening intellectual environment: Why females are susceptible to experiencing problem-solving deficits in the presence of males. Psychological Science, 11, 365-371.+

 

February 24

Cognition, attribution and interaction

 

Hilton, D. (1990). Conversational processes and causal explanation. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 65-81.*

Schwarz, N., Strack, F., Hilton, D., & Naderer, G. (1991). Base rates, representativeness, and the logic of conversation: The contextual relevance of "irrelevant" information. Social Cognition, 9, 67-84.

Swann, W. B., Giuliano, T., & Wegner, D. M. (1982). Where leading questions can lead: The power of conjecture in social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 1025-1035.

Malle, B. F., & Pearce, G. E. (2001). Attention to behavioral events during interaction: Two actor-observer gaps and three attempts to close them. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 278-294.*

Kemmelmeier, M., Bless, H., Schwarz, N., & Bohner, G. (in press). What research participants learn from rewards: A conversational logic analysis of rewarding reasoning performance. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive/Current Psychology of Cognition.

 

March 2

Language and communication

 

Semin, G. R., & Fiedler, K. (1988). The cognitive function of linguistic categories in describing persons: Social cognition and language. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 558-568.*

Sanchez-Burks, J., Lee, F., Choi, I., Nisbett, R., Zhao, S., Koo, J. (2003). versing across cultures: East-west communication styles in work and nonwork contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 363-372.*

Higgins, E. T. (1992). Achieving “shared reality” in the communication game: A social action that creates meaning. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 11, 107-125.

Guerin, B. (2003). Language use as social strategy: A review and an analytic framework for the social sciences. Review of General Psychology, 7, 251-298.*

 

March 9

Affect and interpersonal comparisons

 

Tesser, A., Millar, M, & Moore, J. (1988). Some affective consequences of social comparison and reflection processes: The pain and pleasure of being close. Journal of Personality and social psychology, 54, 49-61.*

Kulik, J. A., Mahler, H. I. M., & Moore, P. J. (1996). Social comparison and affiliation under threat: Effects of recovery from major surgery. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 967-979.*

Christophe, V., & Rime, B. (1997). Exposure to the social sharing of emotion: Emotional impact, listener responses and secondary social sharing. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 37-54.+

Cahill, S. E., & Eggleston, R. A. (1994). Managing emotions in public: The case of wheelchair users. Social Psychology Quarterly, 57, 300-312.+

 

March 16

SPRING BREAK – no class

 

March 23

Interpersonal influence and negotiation

 

Rafaeli, A., & Sutton, R. I., (1991). Emotional contrast strategies as means of social influence: Lessons from criminal interrogators and bill collectors. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 749-775.+

Chartrand, T., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). The chameleon effect: The perception-behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 893-910.*

Burger, J. M. (1986). Increasing compliance by improving the deal: The that's-not-all technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 277-283.

O'Connor, K. M., & Carnevale, P. J. (1997). A nasty but effective negotiation strategy: Misrepresentation of a common-value issue. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 504-515.+

Ross, L., & Ward. A. (1995). Psychological barriers to dispute resolution. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 27, pp. 255-304). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

 

March 26

Deadline research proposal—outline

 

March 30

Power

 

Lee, F., & Tiedens, L. Z. (2001). Is it lonely at the top?: The independence and interdependence of power holders. Research in Organizational Behavior, 23, 43-91.

Galinsky, A. D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Magee, J. C. (2002). From power to action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 453-466.*

Molm, L. D. (1997). Risk and power use: Constraints on the use of coercion in exchange. American Sociological Review, 62, 113-133.+

Snyder, M., & Kiviniemi, M. T. (2001). Getting what they came for: How power influences the dynamics and outcomes of interpersonal interaction. In A. Y. Lee-Chai, & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The use and abuse of power: Multiple perspectives on the causes of corruption (pp. 133-155). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press/Taylor & Francis.

Cast, A. D. (2003). Power and the ability to define the situation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 66, 185-201.+

 

April 6

Relating

 

Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497-529.*

Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. R. (1990). Love and work: An attachment-theoretical perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 270-280.

Baldwin, M. W., Carrell, S. E., & Lopez, D. F. (1990). Priming relationship schemas: My advisor and the Pope are watching me from the back of my mind. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 435-454.

Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Norman, C. (2001). Self-expansion model of motiviaton and cognition in relationships and beyond. In G. J. O. Fletcher & M. S. Clark (Eds.), Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Interpersonal processes (pp. 478-499). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

Burke, P. J., & Stets, J. E. (1999). Trust and commitment through self-verification. Social Psychology Quarterly, 62, 347-366.+

 

April 13

Attraction, love and sex

 

Foster, C. A., Witcher, B. S., Campbell, W. K., & Green, J. D. (1998). Arousal and attraction: Evidence for automatic and controlled processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 86-101.*

Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual Strategies Theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204-232.*

Beall, A. E., & Sternberg, R. J. (1995). The social construction of love. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 12, 417-438.

Laumann, E. O., & Gagnon, J. H. (1995). A sociological perspective on sexual action. In R. G. Parker & J. H. Gagnon (Eds.), Conceiving sexuality: Approaches to sex research in a postmodern world (pp. 183-213). Florence, KY: Taylor & Francis.

Baumeister, R. F., & Bratslavsky, E. (1999). Passion, intimacy, and time: Passionate love as a function of change in intimacy. Personality & Social Psychology Review, 3, 49-67.

 

April 20

Relationships processes

 

Rusbult, C. E., Arriaga, X. B., & Agnew, C. R. (2001). Interdependence in close relationships. In G. J. O. Fletcher & M. S. Clark (Eds.), Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Interpersonal processes (pp. 359-387). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

Murray, S. L., & Holmes, J. G. (1993). Seeing virtues in faults: Negativity and the transformation of interpersonal narratives in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 707-722.*

Clark, M. S., Mills, J., &Powell, M. C. (1986). Keeping track of needs in communal and exchange relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 333-338.

Gottman, J., Coan, J., Carree, S., & Swanson, C. (1998). Predicting martial happiness and stability from newlywed interactions. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 5-22.+

McKenna, K. Y. A., Green, A. S., Gleason, M. E. J. (2002). Relationship formation on the internet: What’s the big attraction? Journal of Social Issues, 58, 9-31.+

 

April 27

Aggression

 

Smuts, B. (1996). Male aggression against women: An evolutionary perspective. In D. M. Buss & N. M. Malamuth (Eds.), Sex, power, conflict: Evolutionary and feminist perspectives (pp. 231-268). New York: Oxford University Press. [reprinted from Human Nature, 3, 1-44.]

Twenge, J. M., Baumeister, R. F., Tice, D. M., & Stucke, T. S. (2001). If you can't join them, beat them: Effects of social exclusion on aggressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1058-1069.*

Bushman, B. (2002). Does venting anger feed or extinguish the flame? Catharsis, rumination, distraction, anger, and aggressive responding. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 724-731.

Cohen, D., Vandello, J., Puente, S., & Rantilla, A. (1999). "When you call me that, smile!" How norms for politeness, interaction styles, and aggression work together in Southern culture. Social Psychology Quarterly, 62, 257-275.+

Reifman, A. S., Larrick, R. P., & Fein, S. (1991). Temper and temperature on the diamond: The heat-aggression relationship in major league baseball. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 580-585.

 

May 4

Prosocial behavior

 

Dovidio, J. F., & Penner, L. A. (2001). Helping and altruism. In G. J. O. Fletcher & M. S. Clark (Eds.), Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Interpersonal processes (pp.162-195). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

Burnstein, E., Crandall, C., & Kitayama, S. (1994). Some neo-Darwinian decision rules for altruism: Weighing cues for inclusive fitness as a function of the biological importance of the decision. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 773-789.*

Holmes, J. G., Miller, D. T., & Lerner, M. J. (2002). Committing altruism under the cloak of self-interest: The exchange fiction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 144-151.+

Pemberton, M., & Sedikides, C. (2001). When do individuals help close others improve? The role of information diagnosticity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 234-246.*

Batson, C. D., Ahmad, N., Yin, J., Bedell, S. J., Johnson, J. W., Templin, C. M., & Whiteside, A. (1999). Two threats to the common good: Self-interested egoism and empathy and empathy-induced altruism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 3-16.+

 

May 9

Deadline research proposal—full paper

 

 

* available via www.library.unr.edu via PsycArticles

+ available via www.library.unr.edu – electronic journals`