The
relationship between reliance on food caching, spatial memory and the
hippocampus – an intraspecific comparison

The proposed
research will investigate whether environmental conditions that place higher
demands on spatial memory and the hippocampus result in enhanced spatial memory
and an enlarged hippocampus with more neurons and higher cell proliferation
rates. I will use a comparative method and a common garden experiment to test a
prediction that black-capped chickadees in northern populations have evolved
enhanced spatial memory and an enlarged hippocampus with more neurons. First, I
will compare hippocampal structure in black-capped chickadees from twelve
populations along latitudinal gradient. Food-caching birds rely on their caches
to survive winters and use spatial memory for successful cache recovery. Both
theoretical and empirical studies suggest that energetically demanding
ecological conditions should result in more intensive food caching. Theoretical
models also suggest that more caching along with successful cache recovery
should significantly increase probability of survival in birds specifically when
environmental conditions are more energetically demanding and unpredictable like
those in northern populations. It is
thus reasonable to predict that chickadees living in more northern environments
should depend on caches more heavily because of harsher winter conditions (lower
air temperature, snow cover, shorter day length, longer winter) and thus should
experience higher demands for spatial memory than their more southern
conspecifics. I expect that
individuals from northern populations have an enlarged hippocampus with more
neurons and higher hippocampal cell proliferation rates compared to their
southern conspecifics. Comparing individuals of the same species will allow me
to avoid potential pitfalls typical of inter-specific comparisons because
different species might have many other ecological differences influencing their
memory (Pravosudov & Clayton 2002). There could be two potential underlying
mechanisms for the differences in memory and the hippocampus between northern
and southern populations: (1) these differences might have a genetic basis as a
result of higher selection pressure on memory in northern birds and (2) these
differences might have an environmental basis and northern birds might have
better memory and larger hippocampus as a result of more extensive food-caching
experience. I will perform a common garden experiment in which northern and
southern black-capped chickadees will be collected from nests and hand-raised in
identical laboratory conditions. All birds will be given identical food-caching
experience and then tested on various spatial memory tasks during their first
winter. After behavioral experiments, I will sacrifice all birds for the
analyses of hippocampal formation (volume, total number of neurons and cell
proliferation rates) and the rest of the brain (mass, total volume). This study
will thus test two predictions from the adaptive specialization hypothesis: (1)
individuals in northern populations should have a relatively larger hippocampus
with more neurons and higher cell proliferation rates and (2) these differences
between northern and southern populations have evolved as a result of higher
selection pressure on memory and the hippocampus and thus they are inherited.
COMPARISON
OF MULTIPLE POPULATIONS. To
establish a pattern that northern environmental conditions result in enhanced
memory and an enlarged hippocampus, it is crucial to compare multiple
populations to ensure that the differences between northern and southern
chickadees are indeed due to environmental conditions associated with
latitudinal gradient (shorter days, more snow, lower air temperatures).
Black-capped chickadees present the best model to test the prediction that
northern individuals have relatively larger hippocampal volume with more neurons
compared to more southern individuals using multiple populations because this
species has the largest south-north distribution among all North American
food-caching species.
In this study I will
compare relative hippocampal volume, the total number of neurons, total brain
volume in chickadees from 12 populations across latitudinal gradient ranging
from Colorado and Kansas in the south to Northern Alaska and Maine in the north
(Fig. 1). Comparing these populations should allow establishing whether relative
hippocampal size and the number of neurons increase gradually from south to
north or whether there is a significant increase only in the most northern
populations.
Because
individuals from northern and southern populations might differ in body and
total brain size, it is important to measure body size (wing length, tarsus,
body mass) and total brain volume and brain mass to control for when testing for
differences in the hippocampus. Comparative studies have always used relative
hippocampal volume controlled for the overall telencephalon size. If birds in
the north are simply bigger with bigger brains, they might have larger absolute
hippocampus but there is no reason to expect that they will have relatively
larger hippocampus simply because these birds are larger. Whereas it is possible
that factors other than reliance on food caches might have contributed to
possible differences between southern and northern individuals in body size or
total brain size, hippocampus is a brain structure specifically involved in
memory processing and thus relative hippocampal size is likely to have
been affected specifically by the factors impacting memory. Interestingly, in my
preliminary study black-capped chickadees from Alaska were significantly smaller
than their southern conspecifics and they had significantly smaller brain
volume, but they had significantly larger absolute and relative hippocampal
volume with more neurons compared to southern chickadees (Pravosudov &
Clayton 2002).
COMMON
GARDEN EXPERIMENT. Another serious
weakness of the Pravosudov & Clayton (2002) study concerns the fact that it
remains unknown whether differences in memory and the hippocampus between
Alaskan and Colorado black-capped chickadees are experience or genetic based.
The adaptive specialization hypothesis implies that predicted enhanced memory
and enlarged hippocampus in northern populations are genetically based as a
result of higher selection pressure for better memory in northern populations.
An alternative hypothesis is that some specific memory-related experiences
directly affect memory and the hippocampus and northern individuals might have
enhanced memory and larger hippocampus simply as a result of more such
experiences. To establish that predicted differences between northern and
southern populations in memory and the hippocampus are genetically based it is
crucial to ensure that individuals from these populations share identical
experiences. A common garden experiment in which all individuals are reared in
identical environment is a good way to test whether any possible population
differences in memory and the hippocampus are genetically based. In this study I
will perform a common garden experiment by hand-raising black-capped chickadees
from Alaska and Colorado in identical laboratory conditions and then testing for
any possible differences between them in spatial memory, hippocampal volume, and
neuron number. This would be the first experiment to test whether environmental
conditions providing high selection pressure on memory and the hippocampus might
result in evolution of enhanced spatial memory and an enlarged hippocampus
within the same species.