ISSN 1087-3430 Vol. 3 - No. 4 - June 1999
Thank you for your interest in the Electronic Journal of Science Education, the first electronic journal of its kind devoted to the timely sharing of science education issues via the World Wide Web. The editors and review board hope you find the enclosed articles academically and professionally valuable.
John R. Cannon,
Editor and Publisher
David T. Crowther,
Associate Editor and Publisher
University of Nevada, Reno
Editorial...
"We Are Not Grease Monkeys Anymore."
by
John R. Cannon
Editor and Publisher
EJSE
Guest Editorial...
When Public Understanding of
Science Thwarts Standards-Based Science Education
by
John R. Staver
Center for Science Education
Kansas State University
1999 President, Association for the Education of Teachers in Science
Article One
Improving Graphing Intrepretation Skills and Understanding of Motion Using Microcomputer Based Laboratories
by
Michael Svec,
Ph.D.
Furman University
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to examine the relative effectiveness of the
traditional lab method and the microcomputer-based laboratory (MBL) for
improving student understanding. Three areas of achievement were examined:
graphing interpretation skills, interpreting motion graphs and
understanding of motion The nonequivalent control-group design was
selected with the treatment group conducting using MBL activities and the
control group employing traditional laboratories. All the students were
enrolled in introductory college physics classes. Item analysis revealed
both control and treatment groups confused position, velocity,
acceleration, and distance, velocity, and acceleration-time graphs on the
pre-test. On the post-test, the control group scores improved only
slightly. The treatment group demonstrated a less thorough understanding
than the control on the pre-test, but the treatment group outperformed the
control group on the post-test. Effect sizes were 0.78, 1.71 and 0.88 for
graphing interpretation skills, interpreting motion graphs and conceptual
understanding of motion respectfully. Results indicate that MBL
laboratories are more effective than traditional lab for improving
students' graphing interpretation skills, interpreting motion graphs and
their understanding of motion. MBL is an effective tool for challenging
students' naive beliefs.
Editors Note: We regret that the two figures orginally published in the manuscript below were in error. If you downloaded this
article before 8/3/99, please download again with the correct figures. We deeply apologize to the authors and our readers for this confusion.
Article Two
Pedagogical Content Knowledge Taxonomies
by
William R. Veal
The University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill
CB #3500
Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3500
and
James G. MaKinster
Indiana University
School of Education
201 N. Rose Ave.
Bloomington, IN 47405
Abstract
Pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) has been embraced by many of the recent educational reform documents as a way of describing the knowledge possessed by expert teachers. These reform documents have also served as guides for educators to develop models of science teacher development. However, few of the current models accurately address the role of PCK in science teacher professional development. This paper presents two taxonomies that offer a relatively comprehensive categorization scheme for future studies of PCK development in teacher education. The General Taxonomy of PCK addresses the distinctions within and between the knowledge bases of various disciplines, science subjects and science topics. The Taxonomy of PCK Attributes identifies the various components of PCK and characterizes their relative importance based on previously published studies. These organizational frameworks will serve to organize and integrate future research efforts.
Article 3
Supporting the Implementation of Inquiry-based Elementary Science Programs:
Setting the Stage for Local Reform
by
Andrew T. Lumpe
Southern Illinois
University
Carbondale, IL 62901
alumpe@siu.edu
Charlene M. Czerniak
University of
Toledo
Toledo, OH 43606
cczerni@uoft02.utoledo.edu
and
Jodi J. Haney
Bowling Green State
University
Bowling Green, OH 43403
jhaney@bgnet.bgsu.edu
Abstract
The primary goal of this report is to describe the context and support
structures involved in the implementation of a National Science Foundation
funded professional development program designed to train elementary
teachers to use exemplary science curriculum materials. To conduct the
program evaluation, a variety of data sources were used including teacher
and principal questionnaires, academic year classroom observations, summer
institute observations, teacher interviews, project team and Project
Director interviews, student interviews, support teacher interviews, and
teacher belief instruments. The following essential components were
identified for the successful implementation of the systemic reform
efforts:
1) purposeful interactions among all important stakeholders in the
project;
2) peer mentoring by teacher leaders;
3) purposeful experiences with the science curriculum materials;
4)
interdisciplinary connections to other key subjects such as reading and
mathematics;
5) adoption of quality science curriculum materials;
6)
professional development experiences that promote the nature of science;
7)
professional development on science content related to the curriculum
materials; and
8) experiences that lead to positive teacher beliefs.
EJSE's Exemplar Lesson Plans
Raphanus sativus, Germination, and Inquiry:
A Learning Cycle Approach for Novice Experimenters
by
Peter Rillero
Arizona State University West
Back to the EJSE Archive Page